No account? Create an account
 The disturbance matrix and covariance - Econometrics Forum [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Econometrics Forum

 [ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ] [ archive | journal archive ]

The disturbance matrix and covariance [Oct. 14th, 2009|04:45 pm]
Econometrics Forum
 econometrics[cnmtrcs]

This may be a silly question, but I would really appreciate a serious answer.

The disturbance matrix can be constructed by multiplying the disturbance vector with its transpose. The diagonal then contains variances, the off-diagonal elements are covariances between pairs of observations (right?).

My question is: Why do we get covariances this way (when its formula is more demanding)? Is it because the expected value of the disturbance term is 0, so that it already contains deviance scores (where the mean is subtracted)?

I am inclined to think so, but I don’t like the fact that the means that are subtracted are based on all the observations, whereas the “covariances” in the matrix just concern single pairs of them. Am I missing something? Is it ok to base the expected values used in the covariance formula on more observations than are included in the calculation of specific entries?

From: (Anonymous)
2009-12-13 10:45 pm (UTC)

### The disturbance matrix and covariance

Hi!

Probably you are referring to variance-covariance matrix. Yes, u r right. Diagonal elements are variances and off-diagonal elements are cross-covariance terms.

By construction, the OLS estimates with constant term yield zero mean error term. So, the mean of the errors is not really subtracted in the definition of the covariance matrix but it is zero by construction.

My regards

Costas

From: (Anonymous)
2010-07-01 12:41 pm (UTC)

### Multilogit model

Firstely thank you for these diffirent discus

I hope that some one have worked with the liogit,multilogit model;
i want to know, how to estimate these model in eviews?
i m working whith qualitatives variabl..

Best regards for all

Ramdan